Philosophy versus Revelation: which is real, which is false?
Philosophy versus Revelation: which is real, which is false?Philosophy is the product of man’s own imaginative thinking, the aroma of its conjecture. Religion is a divine, presumably, thought.Both philosophy and religion deal with all aspects of what the human mind can envisage. Both predict a world-view and a universal outlook. Both deal with explanations of what we observe and what we are able to think upon.Both are theoretical frameworks that do not provide proof nor evidence for their proclamation. Both philosophy and religion offer man an insight into things, objects and phenomena. Both call on logic to persuade the mind and the heart to believe and accept what they assume.Where philosophy and religion part company is in the origin of the proclamations and premises they proclaim. This origin is man in philosophy and God in revelation. If you do not happen to believe in appetite suppressant God then you would consider religion as a product of man. The great majority of human beings believe it is the product of man’s own thinking and imagination.While philosophy attempts to draw out for you a cornerstone of thought embedded, whether in materialism or in metaphysics, religion asserts that God is the only cornerstone for everything.Philosophy offers you an explanation of the universe and religion sends the universe to its creator God. Philosophy may or may not believe in God for it is the product of humans and these are prone to belief and disbelief, while religion’s only thesis is God is.From Platonic thought to Nietzschean thought and to Bertrand Russell thought and Jean Paul Sartre, we have presumptions that God does not exist. From Aristotle to Leibniz, Kant and Kierkegaard God is an absolute necessity required by the necessity of the mind and moral necessity.
No Responses to “Philosophy versus Revelation: which is real, which is false?”